<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bainbridge Shoreline Homeowners &#187; Property Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/category/property-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Protecting the environment and our property rights.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Bainbridge Shoreline Homeowners" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>COBI attorney should study results of recent Kitsap Alliance lawsuit.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/cobi-attorney-should-study-results-of-recent-kitsap-alliance-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/cobi-attorney-should-study-results-of-recent-kitsap-alliance-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 14:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bainbridge SMP Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffers & Setbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=10037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court denied PLF’s petition for a writ of certiorari in the case, Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board – a case that challenged Kitsap County’s adoption of regulations that require shoreline property owners who seek building permits to dedicate significant portions of their shoreline as environmental conservation [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=10037&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/cobi-attorney-should-study-results-of-recent-kitsap-alliance-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court denies Kitsap Alliance petition.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/u-s-supreme-court-denies-kitsap-alliance-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/u-s-supreme-court-denies-kitsap-alliance-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bainbridge SMP Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=9981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, the U.S. Supreme Court denied our petition for a writ of certiorari. As you know, the petition asked the Court to consider whether a Kitsap County regulation requiring that shoreline property owners who seek building permits dedicate significant portions of their shoreline as environmental conservation buffers violates the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=9981&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/u-s-supreme-court-denies-kitsap-alliance-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court rules that EPA is not above the law.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/21/supreme-court-rules-that-epa-is-not-above-the-law/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/21/supreme-court-rules-that-epa-is-not-above-the-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=9966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners, the United States Supreme Court today held that landowners have a right to direct, meaningful judicial review if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency effectively seizes control of their property by declaring it to be “wetlands.” The Court ruled in favor of Mike and Chantell Sackett, of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=9966&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/21/supreme-court-rules-that-epa-is-not-above-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.pacificlegal.org/view.image?Id=1467" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutionality of Kitsap shoreline buffers submitted to U.S. Supreme Court.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/constitutionality-of-kitsap-shoreline-buffers-submitte-to-u-s-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/constitutionality-of-kitsap-shoreline-buffers-submitte-to-u-s-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=9888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pacific Legal Foundation’s constitutional challenge to Washington state’s shoreline buffer scheme is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.  The case, Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (KAPO), began over a half decade ago, when Kitsap County, acting under the mandate of Washington’s Growth Management Act, declared all private [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=9888&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/constitutionality-of-kitsap-shoreline-buffers-submitte-to-u-s-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMP Update legal issues forum&#8230; revisited.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/smp-update-legal-issues-forum-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/smp-update-legal-issues-forum-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bainbridge SMP Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=9835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 9, 2011, Bainbridge Shoreline Homeowners invited attorney Dennis Reynolds to join us for a discussion of the legal issues surrounding the city’s Shoreline Master Program update. We recorded the presentation for those who couldn’t attend. If you haven&#8217;t seen them, or just can&#8217;t wait to see them again, you can watch the videos [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=9835&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/smp-update-legal-issues-forum-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Washington State rulings on property rights.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/recent-washington-state-rulings-on-property-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/recent-washington-state-rulings-on-property-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=7936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swinomish Indian Tribes and Washington Environmental Council vs. Skagit County The tribes and the WEC argued that Growth Management Act’s Best Available Science requires mandatory buffers and the owners of existing farms must plant 200 ft buffers on all their streams. This would, of course, have put a lot of farmers out of business. In [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=7936&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/recent-washington-state-rulings-on-property-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does the SMP have to do with property rights?</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/06/25/what-does-the-smp-have-to-do-with-property-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/06/25/what-does-the-smp-have-to-do-with-property-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bainbridge SMP Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=7646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arbitrary land use regulation has federal and state constitution civil rights and property rights implications.  The Washington State Attorney General stated the following in an advisory memorandum to state and local agencies&#8230; The public problem must be proven. In assessing whether a regulation has exceeded substantive due process limitations and should be invalidated, the court [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=7646&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/06/25/what-does-the-smp-have-to-do-with-property-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amicus brief filed in support of &#8220;big buffer&#8221; challenge.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/amicus-brief-filed-in-support-of-big-buffer-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/amicus-brief-filed-in-support-of-big-buffer-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buffers & Setbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitsap County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=7345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bainbridge Shoreline Homeowners has filed an amicus brief supporting a petition by the Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners asking the Washington State Supreme Court to review a Court of Appeals’ decision, in the matter of Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (Div. II Nos. 38017-0-II and 38087-1-II, Jan. 4, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=7345&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/amicus-brief-filed-in-support-of-big-buffer-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/supreme-court-ltr-re-answers-to-amicus-memos-061511.jpg?w=123" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Supreme Court ltr re answers to amicus memos 061511</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Am I free to walk across someone else&#8217;s beach?</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/am-i-free-to-walk-across-someone-elses-beach/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/am-i-free-to-walk-across-someone-elses-beach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 16:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=6692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I am a South Beach waterfront property owner with a question that I need some help in clarifying.  The issue is natural shoreline access. I have lived and walked along the South Beach shoreline from Country Club to the fish farm for some 11 years.  Recently one of the newly moved in neighbors informed us [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=6692&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/am-i-free-to-walk-across-someone-elses-beach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>KAPO files &#8220;big buffer&#8221; petition with WA Supreme Court.</title>
		<link>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/kapo-files-big-buffer-petition-with-wa-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/kapo-files-big-buffer-petition-with-wa-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bshadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buffers & Setbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitsap County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/?p=6553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from Brian Hodges, Pacific Legal Foundation I am writing to let you know that PLF just filed the attached petition for review seeking to challenge the critical area &#8220;big buffer&#8221; scheme to Washington’s Supreme Court. The petition was filed earlier today requesting that the Supreme Court take review of the Court of Appeals’ decision, Kitsap [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com&#038;blog=4336687&#038;post=6553&#038;subd=bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bainbridgeshorelinehomeowners.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/kapo-files-big-buffer-petition-with-wa-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bshadmin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
